Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Creating perfection: Did man create God?



Image Credit: Picable.com

There are a lot of online conversations that talk about how instead of God creating man, it is man who created God by copying the main gods of the old polytheistic religions.

Reasons to Believe founder Hugh Ross, in this video, says that the idea of man creating God by copying the old, so-called gods is an absolute fallacy. This is because the Judeo-Christian God Yahveh Elohim’s powers and characteristics are a lot different than the other so-called polytheistic deities. In addition, Yahveh is the one true God and that the other deities do not exist.

Image Credit: Guardian.co.uk

In addition, man is an imperfect being. It would be impossible for imperfect beings to create a perfect, all-powerful God. When creating something, man has a tendency to bring his own qualities to the things he creates. This is why humans are making robots look and function like humans. God does not have those qualities and is perfect in every way.

Image Credit: E-How.com

The world is a complex place filled with wonders, and it is a wonder why it appeared out of nothing. Even the organisms that exist in this world are far too complex to just come into existence by happenstance. Those reasons alone are strong pieces of evidence of an all-powerful, eternal Creator.

If you have more questions on the existence of God, you may visit this website to learn more.

Morals: Do atheists have them?


Image Credit: OregonLive.com

Atheism, according to this article from WashingtonPost.com, is on the rise. The decline of religiosity in the US is worrying a lot of people, especially theists, most of whom think that atheists have no morals and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to influence society with their disbelief, lest society destroys itself.

Image Credit: TheSocietyPages.org

Believing that atheists have no morals is misguided. They do have morals and ethics. What makes them different from Christians is that their morals and ethics are guided by the society’s best interests and is therefore impermanent. That is to say, when the legal systems and laws change, their morals change. All atheists live according to common sense and codified laws. If a certain activity would hinder their desires to have a better life and a better society, it would not be feasible for them to do it. However, if in the next century theft became legal, atheists may not think twice, especially if it will serve their self-interests.

Christians, whose morals come from a set of laws and fear of an absolute and powerful God, do not have this problem. Even if laws and rules change, stealing will always be stealing—a sin in the eyes of God will not be condoned no matter the reason.

Image Credit: ThinkAtheist.com

According to this article from Reasons to Believe, atheists nowadays are less likely to have a clear sense of purpose in life, to want just one partner for life, and to make a difference in the world, compared to religious people. It just shows that moral beliefs, which are based on the word of God, affect behavior.

Dr. Hugh Ross is the president and founder of Reasons to Believe. For more information, visit this website.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Schools can sidestep Christian worship rule, say religious education groups

This article from the Guardian.co.uk talks about the imperative on the daily act of collective worship in schools, specifically on how to implement it among a diverse group of student with varying religious beliefs.

Guidance suggests 'imaginative interpretation' of longstanding law, but DfE says it has not changed its policy.  Schools do not need to focus predominantly on Christian teaching in daily assemblies, contrary to a rule in place for more than 60 years, according to advice from a pair of professional groups representing religious education teachers and others involved in the sector.

The guidance tells schools that the Department for Education (DfE) appears happy for them to take a distinctly loose interpretation on the longstanding instructions for a daily group worship session that is "wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character".

This rule, introduced in 1944 and enshrined in later education acts, applies to all state schools other than those that specifically apply for exceptions, for example several dozen state-funded Jewish schools. However, the DfE said it had not changed its policy.

The rules were formalised in official advice for schools in January 1994, the so-called Circular 1/94, but the reality has long been different. A survey for BBC local radio last year found that 64% of parents said their children did not attend daily collective worship. A paper by two groups – the National Association of Standing Advisory Councils on Religious Education (Nasacre), which represents local groups determining religious education content in schools, and the Association of Religious Education Inspectors, Advisers and Consultants (Areiac) – says the government now allows schools to be "flexible" in their interpretation of the 1994 directive.

The paper advises schools on "an imaginative interpretation of the law" and offers examples such as a week of assemblies for a primary school covering some Christian content but also elements of Buddhism and lessons from the US civil rights movement and anti-debt campaigners. Bruce Gill, the Nasacre chair, told the Times Educational Supplement that such an interpretation allowed schools to deal better with a more varied pupil intake.


"There was a feeling for many practising in schools that the guidance was restricting their flexibility to respond to the diversity of their pupils. People felt shackled by this document," he said. The guidance was welcomed by the National Secular Society, among others, but the DfE noted that Nasacre and Areiac had no statutory powers.

A spokesman said: "The DfE's policy has not changed at all. The law has also not changed and remains perfectly clear; all schools must hold a daily act of collective worship which must be broadly Christian. The only exception is for schools which have chosen to follow another faith, such as Judaism."

Source:http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/nov/09/schools-sidestep-christian-worship-rule#start-of-comments

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Hugh Ross and Reasons to Believe: Embracing a unique set of core values

Hugh Ross Image Credit: patheos.com


“To engage and quip.”

That was the mission Dr. Hugh Ross had in mind in forming Reasons to Believe, a Christian ministry organized to spread the Christian Gospel by demonstrating that sound reason and scientific research support confidence in the truth of the Bible and faith in the transcendent God revealed in both the Scripture and nature.

With this guidepost, he has gathered a team of leaders holding on to a solid set of core values or beliefs that makes them stand among the rest. Some of these features are as follows:

• A creation and ongoing development of a testable creation model for people to have steadfast faith in God;
• Honing apologetics for the sake of evangelization in order to fulfill the completion of the commission Christ assigned to his followers;


Hugh Ross Image Credit: rtbtaketwo.wordpress.com

Dr. Hugh Ross founded Reasons to Believe in 1986.

• An effort in integrating God’s revelation both in the Scripture and nature;
• A high regard for both the Bible and science since the Scripture and nature come from the same source—God himself;
• Willingness and readiness to give logical reasons for people will always have questions and doubts; and
• A belief that intellectual engagement should lead to effective evangelism through a commitment to application of all things right, and not for the sake of winning arguments.


Hugh Ross Image Credit: news.legalexaminer.com

For more information on Dr. Hugh Ross and his ministry, visit this Twitter page.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

An Astronomer’s Quest: Dr. Hugh Ross to speak at CCV

Hugh Ross Image credit:http://www.reasons.org/about/who-we-are

Reasons To Believe (RTB) President and Founder Dr. Hugh Ross will be sharing his life’s journey to faith at Christ’s Church of the Valley (CCV).
 
Hugh Ross Image credit:www.reasons.org

Dr. Ross will visit CCV San Dimas, California on October 4, 2012 for an outreach event of RTB. Entitled An Astronomer’s Quest, the goal of the event is to share to other people important scientific and biblical facts that aim to develop their faith in Christ as Creator, Lord, and Savior. During the event, Dr. Ross will share his life’s testimony and an account on how the newest scientific discoveries continue to reveal the handiwork of God in His creation, “both at its beginning and in its current state.” 

Hugh Ross Image credit:http://www.reasons.org/about/our-mission

Dr. Hugh Ross founded the science-faith think tank RTB in 1986 with the aim of spreading the Christian Gospel through the demonstration of sound reason and scientific research, which consistently support confidence in the truth of the Bible and faith in the Creator revealed in both Scripture and nature. Over the years, Dr. Ross has authored several books, including The Fingerprint of God, The Creator and the Cosmos, Beyond the Cosmos, A Matter of Days, Creation as Science, Why the Universe Is the Way It is, and More Than a Theory. Registration for the “An Astronomer’s Quest” is free. 

Learn more about the event and its speaker, Dr. Hugh Ross, by visiting RTB’s website at www.reasons.org.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Dr. Hugh Ross: Understanding Imago Dei

This latest blog on Dr. Hugh Ross will discuss the concept of imago Dei, the “image of God.”


Genesis 1:26-27 shares how God created mankind -- in His own image and likeness. This brought forth the term “imago Dei,” the Latin term for the image of God. Although the term has been mentioned several times in different books -- 1 Corinthians 11:7; Colossians 3:10; and James 3:9 included – the verse in Genesis has the most impact as it proclaims how people are created.


Hugh Ross Image Credit: iStockphoto.com


The terms ‘image’ and ‘likeness’ that are used in the verses should be taken as synonymous terms, according to theology experts, which both mean a representation of a thing or something similar to. Thus, theology experts like Dr. Hugh Ross and the team at Reasons to Believe emphasize that when God said he created male and female in His image and likeness, He did not mean that humans are identical with him. Simply, humans are similar (and dissimilar) to God.


What imago Dei entails

Knowing the meaning of the terms does not answer the question as to what imago Dei entails. Kenneth R. Sample dissects the concept into three points of view, as published on RTB’s website. These are:


Hugh Ross Image Credit: Ucobserver.org


The representative view -- Humans represent God. As Genesis 1:26 states: “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” God equipped mankind with the natural ability to rule the world, being the highest form among all His creations.



Dr. Hugh Ross is the founder of Reasons to Believe, a ministry that integrates both science and faith in understanding the Scriptures and in discovering Christ.



The relational view -- Samples shares that the perspective means that humans are like God in terms of their unique relational characteristics.


The functional view -- “This viewpoint insists that being made in the image of God is more about what a person does than what a person is,” Samples shares. This means that it is human actions that reflect the image of God.


Hugh Ross Image Credit: Reasons.org


For more information about Dr. Hugh Ross, visit the Reasons to Believe website.

Monday, July 30, 2012

Hugh Ross presents cogent reasons for the convergence of faith and science

Hugh Ross, founder of the influential Christian think-tank Reasons To Believe (RTB), encourages us to at least try to advance a step beyond ourselves as we chase our imaginations to the heavens so we can conceive the truth about God’s existence even in the midst of overwhelming—yet scarce—scientific pieces of evidence on the origin of the universe.

Dr. Hugh Ross. Image credit: Reasons.org


Ross believes that humanity can both marvel at the achievements of science and wonder at the inspirations of faith. He impressively strikes a fine balance between the cogent scientific principles on the cosmic origin of the universe and the lucid biblical accounts on creation. On one hand, Hugh Ross attempts to rationalize our faith on the existence of God through the evidence of science, while on the other hand, he introduces arguments in favor of the need for science’s recognition of a divine creator even through a simple leap of faith.

Dr. Hugh Ross. Image credit: Reasons.org

Ross is both a serious man of science and an ardent Christian believer who recognizes God’s handiwork in the cosmic origin of the universe. Indeed, for Ross, the problem is not at all complicated and difficult to understand. He simply maintains that the moment we break free from the narrow compass of our understanding, we’ll begin to recognize that there are really certain principles which operate in the world that suggests intelligent design.

Dr. Hugh Ross. Image credit: Reasons.org

For more information on Hugh Ross, visit www.reasons.org.