Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Creating perfection: Did man create God?



Image Credit: Picable.com

There are a lot of online conversations that talk about how instead of God creating man, it is man who created God by copying the main gods of the old polytheistic religions.

Reasons to Believe founder Hugh Ross, in this video, says that the idea of man creating God by copying the old, so-called gods is an absolute fallacy. This is because the Judeo-Christian God Yahveh Elohim’s powers and characteristics are a lot different than the other so-called polytheistic deities. In addition, Yahveh is the one true God and that the other deities do not exist.

Image Credit: Guardian.co.uk

In addition, man is an imperfect being. It would be impossible for imperfect beings to create a perfect, all-powerful God. When creating something, man has a tendency to bring his own qualities to the things he creates. This is why humans are making robots look and function like humans. God does not have those qualities and is perfect in every way.

Image Credit: E-How.com

The world is a complex place filled with wonders, and it is a wonder why it appeared out of nothing. Even the organisms that exist in this world are far too complex to just come into existence by happenstance. Those reasons alone are strong pieces of evidence of an all-powerful, eternal Creator.

If you have more questions on the existence of God, you may visit this website to learn more.

Morals: Do atheists have them?


Image Credit: OregonLive.com

Atheism, according to this article from WashingtonPost.com, is on the rise. The decline of religiosity in the US is worrying a lot of people, especially theists, most of whom think that atheists have no morals and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to influence society with their disbelief, lest society destroys itself.

Image Credit: TheSocietyPages.org

Believing that atheists have no morals is misguided. They do have morals and ethics. What makes them different from Christians is that their morals and ethics are guided by the society’s best interests and is therefore impermanent. That is to say, when the legal systems and laws change, their morals change. All atheists live according to common sense and codified laws. If a certain activity would hinder their desires to have a better life and a better society, it would not be feasible for them to do it. However, if in the next century theft became legal, atheists may not think twice, especially if it will serve their self-interests.

Christians, whose morals come from a set of laws and fear of an absolute and powerful God, do not have this problem. Even if laws and rules change, stealing will always be stealing—a sin in the eyes of God will not be condoned no matter the reason.

Image Credit: ThinkAtheist.com

According to this article from Reasons to Believe, atheists nowadays are less likely to have a clear sense of purpose in life, to want just one partner for life, and to make a difference in the world, compared to religious people. It just shows that moral beliefs, which are based on the word of God, affect behavior.

Dr. Hugh Ross is the president and founder of Reasons to Believe. For more information, visit this website.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Schools can sidestep Christian worship rule, say religious education groups

This article from the Guardian.co.uk talks about the imperative on the daily act of collective worship in schools, specifically on how to implement it among a diverse group of student with varying religious beliefs.

Guidance suggests 'imaginative interpretation' of longstanding law, but DfE says it has not changed its policy.  Schools do not need to focus predominantly on Christian teaching in daily assemblies, contrary to a rule in place for more than 60 years, according to advice from a pair of professional groups representing religious education teachers and others involved in the sector.

The guidance tells schools that the Department for Education (DfE) appears happy for them to take a distinctly loose interpretation on the longstanding instructions for a daily group worship session that is "wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character".

This rule, introduced in 1944 and enshrined in later education acts, applies to all state schools other than those that specifically apply for exceptions, for example several dozen state-funded Jewish schools. However, the DfE said it had not changed its policy.

The rules were formalised in official advice for schools in January 1994, the so-called Circular 1/94, but the reality has long been different. A survey for BBC local radio last year found that 64% of parents said their children did not attend daily collective worship. A paper by two groups – the National Association of Standing Advisory Councils on Religious Education (Nasacre), which represents local groups determining religious education content in schools, and the Association of Religious Education Inspectors, Advisers and Consultants (Areiac) – says the government now allows schools to be "flexible" in their interpretation of the 1994 directive.

The paper advises schools on "an imaginative interpretation of the law" and offers examples such as a week of assemblies for a primary school covering some Christian content but also elements of Buddhism and lessons from the US civil rights movement and anti-debt campaigners. Bruce Gill, the Nasacre chair, told the Times Educational Supplement that such an interpretation allowed schools to deal better with a more varied pupil intake.


"There was a feeling for many practising in schools that the guidance was restricting their flexibility to respond to the diversity of their pupils. People felt shackled by this document," he said. The guidance was welcomed by the National Secular Society, among others, but the DfE noted that Nasacre and Areiac had no statutory powers.

A spokesman said: "The DfE's policy has not changed at all. The law has also not changed and remains perfectly clear; all schools must hold a daily act of collective worship which must be broadly Christian. The only exception is for schools which have chosen to follow another faith, such as Judaism."

Source:http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/nov/09/schools-sidestep-christian-worship-rule#start-of-comments